Image via Wikipedia
The book itself has been co-created with contributions from 470 practitioners from 45 countries. And is backed by both academic & real world research. The business model canvas is built up of 9 building blocks of a business.
- Customer Segments
- Value Propositions
- Channels
- Customer Relationships (Yay! That’s my topic!)
- Revenue Streams
- Key Resources
- Key Activities
- Key Partnerships
- Cost Structure
Without getting into too much details about all the blocks, I would like to draw your attention to only three blocks - Channels, Customer Relationships & Key Activities.
Channels are used to describe how a company communicates with and reaches its customer segments to deliver a value proposition (products/services/offerings). So communication, distribution and sales, or in general, the customer touch points are considered under the Channels block.
With me so far?
So tell me, isn't social media a Channel in this perspective? There would be others obviously and social media is just another channel. Right? Ok, now that we are agreed on this, lets proceed further.
Customer Relationships block describes the types of relationships that the company would have with the specific customer segments, ranging from personal to automated, depending upon the customer segment.
Simple? No brouhaha about databases, command & control, management is evil, software, ugly UI, IT project failures, vendors, etc.?
So when you consider this, CRM has just another extra word in it - management. And this is supposed to help the company manage its Customer Relationships. It thus means the philosophy, culture, processes, tools, etc. needed to help achieve the goal of whatever kind of relationship the company wants to establish with the customer.
CRM-ers will tell you that CRM consists of Marketing, Sales & Customer Service. I guess you could park them under the Key Activities block of the business model canvas. These three activities help us achieve the types of Customer Relationship that the company wants to establish with its Customer Segment. Hope we are now agreed on that aspect as well?
So now, what exactly does then Social Customer Relationship mean, if we are to get back to the title of this post?
You could look at that two ways -
Social + Customer Relationship
orSocial Customer + Relationship
The first has 'social' as a qualifier and is usually defined by many as adding of the new social media channel for communicating with the customers. Which looking at how the building bock of a business model are defined doesn't make proper sense at all. You should be calling it a social channel. And what differentiates the social media from the tradition means of communication? Well, it makes the communication be many to many, public, not private.
What about the second combination? What does a social customer mean? Haven't people always been 'social'? After all, man is a social animal!
Does it mean a customer using the social media to communicate? That doesn't make proper sense, we are still looking at a 'social channel' then. So who is a 'social customer'? I am still trying to grasp this in a manner I can convey it properly. And since there is no academic research (that I know of) to prove that there is indeed a breed that is different from a traditional customer, it is mostly a proposition, based on some trends noticed in customer behavior. May or may not be due to social media. What are these trends?
First is increased possibility to receive information & suggestions from other customers about offerings from various vendors. Though this is how it has always been, newer communication channels are allowing people from near & far share their views & suggestions to one and all across the globe. It takes 300 million tons of CO2 per year just to transmit bits – upload photos, share video, etc. - so we are pretty busy on the Internet. But also look beyond them at mobiles. There are ~4.6 Billion mobile phones in the world today. That's far bigger than any other social network on the Internet. Conversations have increased a lot and people needn't be at a single physical location to have the conversation. The epistolary culture is back. So this collaboration & co-operation between the customers has magnified manifold in terms of both reach & speed.
That brings us to the Second trend which is the implications of this increased propensity to collaborate with people across the globe, due to not only communication channels but also because of the changes in the political situations & the trade / commerce agreements, fall of iron curtains, dethroning of despots, etc. We are now looking at a global scale of collaboration & co-operation in addition to mere communication. Call it Social Capital maybe, this co-operation & collaboration?
So, social in 'social customer' is in a sense just a matter of scale - increased reach & speed of communication, collaboration & co-operation among the customers across the globe. But there is also another aspect in this scale - mass - as in individuals vs communities. Consumer communities have existed since long. But the impromptu gather of customers to communicate, collaborate, co-operate, creating flash communities is yet another scale!
So, its a vaster, faster and heavier customer we are looking at when we talk about a social customer.
And so, the type of customer relationships you want changes when you consider the mass of the customer (individual/community), its the strategies that change when you look at the reach & speed, which means your key activities need tweaking to scale.
And thus, when you look at Social Customer Relationship Management, companies need to consider the mass of the customer for the type of relationship and companies need to consider the reach & speed of the customer for the type of Key Activities needed to achieve the customer relationships.
Summary
Key Activities - Reach & Speed of the customer (real time social media monitoring & response/customer service; word of mouth/viral marketing; customer referrals in sales; etc.)
[Updated: 21st Aug 2010, 1:21 AM EST] I realised I was wrong above. So below is my newer understanding.
Customer Segment - Mass of the customer (individual vs communities)
Channel - Reach of the customer is increased by the channels (social media, social networking sites, mobiles, txt/sms, etc.)
Key Activities - Speed of customer communications means the company has to respond appropriately too & thus tweak its Key Activities to match.
Clear?
Thanks, those were just my notes. Not preachings. So please feel free to let me know if I have erred.

Hi Prem,
ReplyDeleteYou know I love the business model framework Osterwalder put together in this awesome book.. The framework or canvas is a great help in understanding how business models work and a good starting point for building your own.. Most importantly it shows that you need to think about how you are going to deliver your value proposition to your (and which) Customers, what kind of relationships you need to have and how (through which channels) you are going to create and foster them..We knew that of course, but the canvas is a great tool to make that visible and explain it to others.. (ps.. remember my Who - What - How scrm strategy framework statement? who is your customer (segment)?, what is your value proposition? and how will you deliver upon the proposition?; all fits in the cavas nicely..)
There's one statement in your post that surprised me: "<span>And since there is no academic research (that I know of) to prove that there is indeed a breed that is different from a traditional customer, it is mostly a proposition, based on some trends noticed in customer behavior."</span>
It looks to me as if you saying there is a "social customer" and a "traditional customer".. I see it a little different: All Customers are Social Customers in my humbe opinion..
To me the Social Customer is not the high-tech highly-(mobile)-connected Customer, but just the average Customer that is fed up with companies playing tricks on them to gain their last dollars, not their trust and loyalty.. It's the Customer that is tired of being shouted at and who is very well capable of making his own decisions, with a little help from his friends.. It's the customer that has grown "authority" averse...
The Social Customer is also a democratic one, meaning that they want (transparant) options to choose from, meaning that they want some influence over what they are getting from you and the way they are getting that and meaning they are able and willing to use the power of many to show what they want or what they don't like..
There maybe parts in this world where that is not yet completely the case, but that will be a matter of (increasingly shorter) time.. In China there is now already signs of employees striking and demanding better working conditions. This is the first step in Customers doing the same (not strike of course, but you get my drift)..
I think this is not limited to a special Customer, it is not a specific Customer segment, it is all your Customers, whether you like it or not..
At least that's how I think of it..
What do you think?
Wim,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the comment. :)
I agree about the charactecteristics if the customer as you describe above. And as you mentioned this is indeed every customer, there is no distinction between a traditional & social customer. And yet, we all have been trying to capture the characteristics that you mentioned above in a social customer.
From the business model canvas perspective, how does this classification help? That is what I have tried to note down in my post & conclude that this is not how we can grasp the new wave of social customer relationship management and finally close the post with those three blocks of Customer Segments, Channel & Key Activities getting affected, how.
a social customer is an open ended phenomena that is showing us that customers are no longer put in silos, departmentalized and constructed to fit some sort of segment...
ReplyDeletesocial customers is a new modern day of human interactivity, of communicating on various topics, and on doing so in an open environment...
this is the hard thing most cannot grasp, everyone is a social customer even the one's that don't use any social media, because i guarantee you they know someone who is and is filling them in on any information.
thus, to look at the social customer is not to define it, but to drive purpose from this modern day understanding that customers now have three value propositions...
one, they are speaking loudly then ever, this speaking reveals tidbits of information that is relevant to any company
two, they are solving problems with each other and thus this offers more trust in each other then the company
three, its an opportunity for companies to now indulge those people into more participation in co-creating value...
i think the problem with trying to define it is we can't, thus where the problem lies, thus when i speak to people about social media, i tell them you are participating in a adaptive system of social people, some of them will be your customers, and some are your potential customers...
listen with intent, participate with them, engage them respectfully and drive value out of those intentions...
social customer and trying to define it is like trying to shove an elephant into a box and keep it there,
impossible, you can't confine anybody anymore, and surely you can't define them, that's whata the purpose of social customers is, to break free and open up the door to the behaviors that drive the purpose..
purpose being get the real value of what they are saying....socially
Hi Spiro,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the invigorating conversation over on twitter & here. :)
I agree whole heartedly with the aspects of a customer that you want the companies to take notice of in their efforts to build & maintain (combinedly called manage?) which they were not earlier.
The point of this post was to try & fit our grasp on the whole social customer & SCRM thing onto the business model canvas as defined in that book (image at the top of the post is hyperlinked to a bigger version).
And as a consultant & systems integrator, the three blocks that I figured would be crucial (towards the end of the post) would be highly helpful way for me to help my client companies to figure out SCRM, design it & implement it.
I was just kind of thinking aloud this post, literally! :-D So I think I will have to come up with a post later to straighten the meandering thoughts in here & give a clearer picture of how to use the business model canvas. ;)
Regards,
Prem
Prem,
ReplyDeleteAs a CRMer, I would say that it has always been about more than Sales, Marketing and & Service. If you think of it in terms of customer-focused busienss design, there can certainly be more touch points that that. Just my 2 cents.
I wouldn't struggle with the "Social" this versus the "Social" that. It's simply a simplified way of describing a phenomena. Unfortunately, it's not a new one, but it is being facilitated by new platforms, and obvioulsy, the ubiquity we know as the Internert (and applications running on it).
BTW. I can't wait to read that book. It's on it's way and I may get it today. Looking through the outline it seems like a broad management consulting topic. However, is CRM software, or is it a segment of management consulting in the front office? It depends on your perspective. Looks great, thanks Wim for recommending it. Oh, and Wim. A customer is a customer. Sometimes "He" just wants to buy something :)
Mike,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the props on your latest post detailing your journey from CRM to Social CRM!
Having looked at CRM in a traditional sense due to my profession & also having looked at all the social media for personal use, I thought maybe social media could be a better way for the R part of CRM. This was 3 years back.
I now have to do 'strategy consulting' work too, without an MBA to boot and so have to make do with the blogs & books. And you know where this latest book took me. Made me re-organize my world view about CRM/SCRM from a business perspective. It was maybe a good thing I didn't have an MBA, the CEOs with MBAs bring lesser value anyway.
What I loved about the book is that it is allowing me look at the stuff I have learnt in newer ways, thus triggering newer synapses in my brain.
Just like you would differentiate between a data model, business logic & ui in your software, I could begin imagining CRM as a mix of the Customer Segment, Customer Relationship, Channel & Key Activities blocks in the business model canvas. Don't worry am not giving up on software as yet! ;) Just striving to make it better for business. :-D
Regards,
Prem
And Mike, I too figured out in the course of the post that theres no different breed like a social customer, its just used to denote the increase scales in their mass, reach & speed thanks to a combination of the new communication technologies (internet & mobile) and newer sociao-politico-economic situation in the globe. ;)
ReplyDeleteI just added that book to my Amazon shopping cart so thanks for the recommendation. I think the social customer is typically equated with "online customer," as in someone that shops online, looks for recommendations online, shares online, etc. I'm not saying that is necearrily accurate but I think that's how it is perceived. But if we look at usage of mobile and social technologies we do see a behavior change and pattern change in how people shop and converse don't we (and yes I know you touched on these things)? People don't typically need a CRM sytem to manage their personal (or few) relationships but from my understanding CRM is what allows you to scale relationships, which is a bit ironic because by scaling something you are inherently diluting it and thus making the relationship less and less personal.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the book recommendation!
Dear Guest,
ReplyDeleteHope you find the book to be of value to you.
Yes, social customer is typically equated to the online customer, however we both agree there are many more channels of communication than that.
As for CRM, if you consider the buliding blocks of the business model, I guess we can consider it as the set of Key Activities that the Company must do for building & maintaining Relationship with the Customer Segment that the Company is trying to provide & uphold its Value Proposition(s) via the Channels that would serve the purpose the most.
As for diluting the relationship, well, that would depend upon the Customer Segment that the Company wants to serve. If its a Private Bank for the uber rich, I don't think the Customer Segment would be happy with waiting in line for a teller at the bank's branch or press '1' for balance information, '2' for transacting. But I think I am more than happy with my bank even though I have had to visit their branch only twice in 5 years & called them only once. But almost all my personal transactions happen thanks to their excellent online banking system.
Regards,
Prem
The Social Customer is also a democratic one, meaning that they want (transparant) options to choose from, meaning that they want some influence over what they are getting from you and the way they are getting that and meaning they are able and willing to use the power of many to show what they want or what they don't like.
ReplyDeleteA new dynamics is taking shape and is playing out there driven by information revolution unleashed by web. As has already been pointed out by many in the comments section, social customer could be a label we put to new customer behavior being enabled by many drivers and factors including the emergence of social media. I wanted to highlight, what I see as an example of customers using ‘power of many’ to show what they don’t like. Few weeks back, in Mumbai India, an online campaign was started by three advertisement professionals to boycott taxi and autorickshaws on a certain day to protest against them for refusing passengers (forbidden by law) which has become a big problem in Mumbai and some other cities . Labeled as ‘meter jam’ the campaign was latched on by hassled commuters throughout Mumbai and even other cities and spread virally through twitter and facebook. More than 40,000 people showed support on facebook and on designated day, many commuters used car pooling and public transport to avenge taxi drivers arbitrary practices by striking against them by refusing thier services. So are we going to see this phenomenon more in future when consumers will form ‘swarms’ to show their displeasure by striking back, by not using a certain product or service of a company? It definitely looks like that.