Saturday, August 21, 2010

Social Media vs Social Customer Relationship

Business Model Canvas: Nine business model bui...Image via Wikipedia

Notice that I have not used the words marketing or management in the title of this post? This post is just some notes I wanted to take (& thus share) based on what I am reading in the marvelous book called "Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers", which was recommended to me by equally awesome friend & co-conspirator, innovator, agent provocateur in #scrm circles - Wim Rampen. ;)

The book itself has been co-created with contributions from 470 practitioners from 45 countries. And is backed by both academic & real world research. The business model canvas is built up of 9 building blocks of a business.
  • Customer Segments
  • Value Propositions
  • Channels
  • Customer Relationships (Yay! That’s my topic!)
  • Revenue Streams
  • Key Resources
  • Key Activities
  • Key Partnerships
  • Cost Structure

Without getting into too much details about all the blocks, I would like to draw your attention to only three blocks - Channels, Customer Relationships & Key Activities.

Channels are used to describe how a company communicates with and reaches its customer segments to deliver a value proposition (products/services/offerings). So communication, distribution and sales, or in general, the customer touch points are considered under the Channels block.

With me so far?

So tell me, isn't social media a Channel in this perspective? There would be others obviously and social media is just another channel. Right? Ok, now that we are agreed on this, lets proceed further.

Customer Relationships block describes the types of relationships that the company would have with the specific customer segments, ranging from personal to automated, depending upon the customer segment.

Simple? No brouhaha about databases, command & control, management is evil, software, ugly UI, IT project failures, vendors, etc.?

So when you consider this, CRM has just another extra word in it - management. And this is supposed to help the company manage its Customer Relationships. It thus means the philosophy, culture, processes, tools, etc. needed to help achieve the goal of whatever kind of relationship the company wants to establish with the customer.

CRM-ers will tell you that CRM consists of Marketing, Sales & Customer Service. I guess you could park them under the Key Activities block of the business model canvas. These three activities help us achieve the types of Customer Relationship that the company wants to establish with its Customer Segment. Hope we are now agreed on that aspect as well?

So now, what exactly does then Social Customer Relationship mean, if we are to get back to the title of this post?

You could look at that two ways -

Social + Customer Relationship
or
Social Customer + Relationship

The first has 'social' as a qualifier and is usually defined by many as adding of the new social media channel for communicating with the customers. Which looking at how the building bock of a business model are defined doesn't make proper sense at all. You should be calling it a social channel. And what differentiates the social media from the tradition means of communication? Well, it makes the communication be many to many, public, not private.

What about the second combination? What does a social customer mean? Haven't people always been 'social'? After all, man is a social animal!

Does it mean a customer using the social media to communicate? That doesn't make proper sense, we are still looking at a 'social channel' then. So who is a 'social customer'? I am still trying to grasp this in a manner I can convey it properly. And since there is no academic research (that I know of) to prove that there is indeed a breed that is different from a traditional customer, it is mostly a proposition, based on some trends noticed in customer behavior. May or may not be due to social media. What are these trends?

First is increased possibility to receive information & suggestions from other customers about offerings from various vendors. Though this is how it has always been, newer communication channels are allowing people from near & far share their views & suggestions to one and all across the globe. It takes 300 million tons of CO2 per year just to transmit bits – upload photos, share video, etc. - so we are pretty busy on the Internet. But also look beyond them at mobiles. There are ~4.6 Billion mobile phones in the world today. That's far bigger than any other social network on the Internet. Conversations have increased a lot and people needn't be at a single physical location to have the conversation. The epistolary culture is back. So this collaboration & co-operation between the customers has magnified manifold in terms of both reach & speed.

That brings us to the Second trend which is the implications of this increased propensity to collaborate with people across the globe, due to not only communication channels but also because of the changes in the political situations & the trade / commerce agreements, fall of iron curtains, dethroning of despots, etc. We are now looking at a global scale of collaboration & co-operation in addition to mere communication. Call it Social Capital maybe, this co-operation & collaboration?

So, social in 'social customer' is in a sense just a matter of scale - increased reach & speed of communication, collaboration & co-operation among the customers across the globe. But there is also another aspect in this scale - mass - as in individuals vs communities. Consumer communities have existed since long. But the impromptu gather of customers to communicate, collaborate, co-operate, creating flash communities is yet another scale!

So, its a vaster, faster and heavier customer we are looking at when we talk about a social customer.

And so, the type of customer relationships you want changes when you consider the mass of the customer (individual/community), its the strategies that change when you look at the reach & speed, which means your key activities need tweaking to scale.

And thus, when you look at Social Customer Relationship Management, companies need to consider the mass of the customer for the type of relationship and companies need to consider the reach & speed of the customer for the type of Key Activities needed to achieve the customer relationships.

Summary
Customer Relationships - Mass of the customer (individual vs communities)
Key Activities - Reach & Speed of the customer (real time social media monitoring & response/customer service; word of mouth/viral marketing; customer referrals in sales; etc.)


[Updated: 21st Aug 2010, 1:21 AM EST] I realised I was wrong above. So below is my newer understanding.

Customer Segment - Mass of the customer (individual vs communities)
Channel - Reach of the customer is increased by the channels (social media, social networking sites, mobiles, txt/sms, etc.)
Key Activities - Speed of customer communications means the company has to respond appropriately too & thus tweak its Key Activities to match.

Clear?

Thanks, those were just my notes. Not preachings. So please feel free to let me know if I have erred.


Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Knowledge stocks vs Knowledge flows

Insects collecting nectar unintentionally tran...Image via Wikipedia

Traditional IT has been about facilitating the creation & maintenance of Information flows & Data bases. A step ahead of data bases were the knowledge bases, like the intranet which is currently in use. Information flows are seen in the various workflows built within various systems as well as traditional collaboration tools like email & chat.


Social software have generally proven to be a good fit for knowledge flows. This also tends to bring people on the edges together and thus allowing for greater chances of cross pollination of knowledge/ideas. This could lead to increased serendipity as well as employee engagement too.

Another aspect lending to employee engagement could be the conversational approach the top management could adopt to convey their messages to the employees. Though a comment to comment response is not advisable for the top executives, the fact that employees can leave comments on the communication from the top management would provide them with a sense of deeper engagement.

Tacit knowledge is not something that can be captured in knowledge bases and can never really be transmitted to others. Even an apprentice does not learn everything the master knows, even though its the best way for passing on the knowledge from one person to another and thus ensure its longevity.

How do I capture these themes of tacit knowledge, serendipity, employee engagement, etc. as use cases or storyboards?

Monday, August 09, 2010

Social Software for the Enterprise - revisiting the FLOSS options

Candy floss tree. Source: Flickr
I got to know of a new entrant into the confused enterprise 2.0 space which has been open sourced and seems to be funded by the tax payers money of US. Lockheed Martin's new Eureka Streams. Being a FLOSS junkie and somewhat involved in social software for the enterprise use ;) I had to look into it.

And then I noticed in the new stats feature of the blogger platform that the third most read post in my blog between May 2010 & now is an old post where I review some options for Social CRM apps. So I had to write this post to include two new entrants from the FLOSS side.

I was first surprised that there was no mention of Eureka Streams in the twitter broadcasts though it is old news as per twitter speeds. I actually got to know of it from my geeky source Slashdot where Wired's story of a CIA Software developer going open source was discussed. And so I tweeted it out & it got picked up by the enterprise 2.0 and social CRM folks.

Here are a few takes I have on this whole FLOSS based Enterprise Social Networking software thing bubbling up.

Intention

Since the White House has committed itself to open source, many of its vendors are showing a penchant for open sourcing their offerings, though not always using the existing body of work, and thus not really saving the tax payers money. Because money is being spent on writing code all over again. Because the open source communities are being forked. They are unable to figure out the real intent behind the open sourcing of the software from these vendors and are hesitant to put in their effort into these software.

FLOSS developers are not "open up the code & they will come" kind of folks. They are a very hardy community and you need to be a part of that community and gain their trust to be able to get their help. If you need to understand the FLOSS communities better, you need to read Jono Bacon's book Art of Community.

So understandably, there are some apprehensions & possibly aspersions about Lockheed Martin opening up its Enterprise 2.0 code.

Follow Through

Next is the adoption of FLOSS in enterprises. The biggest issue with FLOSS adoption in enterprises, as I also pointed out in my older post is the absence of a neck to strangle when things go wrong. Whom do you call up when theres something wrong with the system? FLOSS is typically supported by a community of developers who are contributing their free time to the development and maintenance of the software. So if you are in a hurry, you need to pay up. This is usually not a problem for enterprises since they are ready to pay up (and if the FLOSS is good, you hardly need to call up someone for help). But the real problem is whom to pay? Companies like RedHat have teams to provide service & support based on SLAs.

Is Lockheed Martin ready to provide such an SLA based support service? Well, since social software is not considered to be business critical, you might now require strict SLAs like that for a Linux server, but that might change too (am looking into a far future where social software is as ubiquitous as email is now).

Integrations

Social software in general has a hurdle in enterprise adoption - integration with existing enterprise systems. And the list includes:
  • email (Exchange & Notes)
  • IM (Sametime & OCS)
  • file sharing (Sharepoint, Alfresco)
  • static Knowledge Bases/Intranets built using CMS (no option for commenting/rating/social sharing are the biggest draw backs)
  • HRMS/ERP (SAP, Peoplesoft)
  • CRMS (Siebel, SFDC, MS Dynamics)
  • portlets/widgets/mashups for any other enterprise apps (WebSphere, jBoss Portals, Corizon, open social)
  • SSO (AD, LDAP)
  • backup & archiving.

Provide out of the box integration capabilities for the leading vendors and separate integrators for the less popular or more arcane/obscure systems and I guess you are golden with the enterprises. Of course these integrators need to be maintained & supported too. I am guess enterprises would be ready to pay a premium here for the more obscure ones.

Enterprise Social Network (ESN) - software framework

The way I have been looking at this space, all enterprise social software require a few major social features:
  • content/conversations(wikis, blogs, forums, comments)
  • networking (profiles, friends, hierarchy/org chart)
  • annotations (tagging, rating, likes, sharing/notifying)
  • collaboration (groups, communities, workspaces, calendar, events, todos, tasks)
  • activity streams (facebook like streams of what everybody in your network & communities have been doing)

Elaboration of the above list might require a separate post if you are not aware of it already. ;) In which case you better hire me. :D

Since these are required in an enterprise, granular access controls & security are important aspects along with the integrations & support aspects I detailed above.

BTW, the only manner in which the various offerings (both proprietary & FLOSS) differ technically are the underlying architectures, UI & terminology.

New FLOSS entrants

Interestingly there are two new entrants in the FLOSS Social Apps category this past few months: Acquia's Drupal Commons & LM's Eureka Streams.

Drupal Commons
Drupal Commons is the good old LAMP based robust CMS Drupal and a few modules that make it a ESN software as described in the above section. The company founded by Drupal founders to address the support issues as highlighted in the Follow Through section above, called Acquia, integrated the Drupal core and the social modules, QAs it and publishes it as an integrated product called Drupal Commons and provides professional services too.

I had the good fortune of getting a demonstration of Drupal Commons from Acquia's CEO Jay Baston, right after the day it's 1.0 version was released (you could say it took ten years to come out, which is good for ya! ;) ). And I must say that I was might impressed with what came out of the box. They got the ESN framework as I understand it quite right, but they do not (yet) have out of the box integrations to the legacy enterprise apps as I point out above. Some are available, some not. But at least the majority of the modules exist already. Its only a matter of incorporating them into the Drupal Commons out of the box. I am hoping their release cycles would be faster initially, to get it all stable and robust soon.

For someone with a greenfield, this seems to be a nice option though. If you do not have a CMS or if you already have a Drupal based CMS (or if you want to migrate to a more 'social' CMS) this can be a strong contender.

If LAMP is not a problem for your IT/architecture department and you are ok with some code customizations, I think Acquia's Drupal Commons is a very inclusion in your list of vendors you are analyzing. Even against the established Enterprise 2.0 products. I hope Acquia makes it to the Gartner MQ. For that they would have to get bigger revenues. And thats a business execution rather than the software.

If you want to know why the Drupal guys came out with this after nearly ten years of building them in a fashion, read this post by Drupal creator Dries Buytaert where he fires a salvo back at some FUD from another leading vendor.

Eureka Streams
Lockheed Martin earlier struggled with user adoption for nearly four years when they implemented a project called Unity that integrated Google Enterprise Search Appliance (GSA), Microsoft’s Windows Sharepoint Servicess (WSS) and NewsGator’s Enterprise Server. That's when they figured out that conversations around the content was the missing aspect. And thus was born Eureka Streams, which basically covers the Networking (profiles, friends) and Activity streams from my ESN software framework.

I looked at their Github page, and for an open source project its a pretty lonely project. It builds on various Apache projects and the code itself is available under Apache 2.0 license, meaning you could white label it! Another aspect is, if you are a Java shop, you can get this into your enterprise without much heartburn as a LAMP based solution would. But then, you would still have to rely on other systems to provide the other aspects from my ESN framework - blogs, wikis, forums, communities, etc.

Summary

The enterprise social networking software space is heating up thanks to their predominant advantages in Knowledge Management, Collaboration & employee engagement as well as social CRM. This is becoming an interesting area since many FLOSS projects have had a lot of time to grow in this space without being considered at an enterprise level before. There are also incumbents thanks to White House's commitment to FLOSS, and these need to provide a support system to get FLOSS community's trust as well as enterprise adoption. You need to map out your organization's business cases & use cases as well as IT considerations before you chose on a vendor. Not an easy task like the vendors might want you to believe.

Interesting times indeed. All the best!

N.B.: All the above are my personal opinions and are not to be utilized for your decision making. You need to indemnify me of any adverse outcomes. I do not have any relationship with either Acquia or Lockheed Martin. Though I was in a demo from Acquia, they did not expect me to write anything about them.

Saturday, August 07, 2010

The new epistolary culture

Jane Austen, Watercolour and pencil portrait b...Image via Wikipedia
Anybody here read Jane Austen's novels? You know the woman who wrote novels that inspired movies like Bride & Prejudice that Aishwarya Rai acted in? You haven't seen the movie? I haven't either. But you surely have read those novesl? No? Please go over to gutenberg.org and download the free etext/audio books and read/listen to them or buy the books from anywhere, Landmark/Crossword/favorite bookstore/footpath. Its all public domain and you can download them with impunity, if you had any. Without fearing any piracy implications. Her books are more than 70 years old and/or she died 60 years ago or any other such law of a country that provides them copyrights.

But wait, this post is not about public domain books, though I would like to ramble on about Project Gutenberg that contains more than 33,000 free ebooks (you got to go there to read all public domain books, meaning all the classics).


This post is about the epistolary culture.

Did you just go, "Eh? Whats an epistolary culture?" like me when I first came across that in this brilliantly written post, though quite misleadingly titled "Intimacy as text, Twitter as tongue"?

The word "Epistolary" comes from the Spanish word "Epistola" which means a letter. So an Epistolary culture means a culture that relied heavily on letters. Like the ones depicted in Jane Austen's novels. Where the characters would write very intimate letters with extreme emotion to each other but would find it very awkward when meeting in real life (as we geeks like to say, IRL) in social settings thanks to the etiquettes of 18th/19th century.

So why am I, a FLOSS/social CRM geek writing about literature all of a sudden? And an epistolary culture?

Because, my friends, I loved classical literature during my early teens. But no, wait. Thats nearly 20 years ago. Why am I writing about them now?

Ok. Seriously (& truthfully) how many of you have had pen friends? You know who pen friends are? They are friends from distant places whom we have not met (nor could you dream of meeting for the most part) but with whom we correspond via letters.

I had one, though it did not blossom well, thanks to the break up of the USSR. I had found my pen friend there thanks to a children's magazine from the erstwhile USSR many of you would not even know - Misha (if you are aware of it, you get a brownie point, but if you actually are a fan of it even now, I will friend you without a blink).

Pen friends are cherished memories of a bygone era. We lament its loss thanks to the technologies taking over and the permeance of the rat race in our lives. We do not write letters to our grandparents, cousins, etc. We don't anxiously wait for the postman any more. Do you even know who the postman is for your area?

This Op-Ed column in New York Times called "Tweet less, Kiss more" asks you to be more physically grounded and enjoy the trip rather than talking on the cellphone while driving.

But did we really lose the epistolary culture? Keeping in touch with friends and relatives far away? Or the other related literary habit of writing daily diaries, usually confessional?

The post I refered to earlier has this to say:
For all the internet’s much-noted permissiveness and available pornography, the increasing presence of computers in our private lives enables a new, overwhelming prudishness — something akin to a second age of letters.

Internet socialization is far closer to a 19th century mode of intimacy than to a dystopian future of tragically disconnected robot prostitutes. There’s a Jane Austen-ish quality to online social life. The written word gains unmatched power and inarguable primacy.
So is it a horrible thing? Losing physical relationship to the power of the written word? Should I just come and shake your hands and talk to you rather than write this blog post? Would I have had the opportunity of knowing so many of you so intimately if I did it all in the physical world?

Well, if you must give up technology, please, by all means use a paper and pen to write out your tweets. Wall Street Journal has written an article on how you could do that! ;)

And may be kissing is not always a good idea either as these girls in this TV ad from an online dating service tell you!


Blog, tweet or kiss - its all about the social animal's need to be in touch with the others of the species.

No man is an Island, entire of it self; every man is a piece of the Continent, a part of the main.

-- John Donne, Devotions (1624)

So how do you look at it? Personally and from a business perspective? Do let us know in the comments.